data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34f53/34f53135df0b4e48ed65ff6819267862148c3673" alt=""
Saw the movie again last weekend, and my fears were confirmed. It really wasn’t as good as the first movie. But then again, very few sequels really do measure up.
At some point, i imagined that the first Iron Man movie was so damn good, that they picked up a lot of old footage off the cutting room floor, added a few new scenes, digitally added Scarlett Johansson (who was abso-tively scorchingly hot) and Don Cheadle, pasted everything together, then called it Iron Man 2.
But i digress...
The most common mistake of sequels is the assumption that with all the groundwork for the character already laid out, they can just assume to proceed making a movie thinking that just making things bigger will end up being better. Or at the very least, the audience will be so overwhelmed with all the bombastic beefiness of the new movie that the thinness of the current movie’s story will be forgiven.
But i digress...
The most common mistake of sequels is the assumption that with all the groundwork for the character already laid out, they can just assume to proceed making a movie thinking that just making things bigger will end up being better. Or at the very least, the audience will be so overwhelmed with all the bombastic beefiness of the new movie that the thinness of the current movie’s story will be forgiven.
Sadly, it usually is.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59e5f/59e5fb0b07ddedc17ea282aa93b63ff0fc203ac0" alt=""
But hey, still not a bad movie by most standards. And yes, it’s still a Downey movie.
No comments:
Post a Comment